0 %

Forming a Company and Considering a Holding: Why the Structure Should Be Clarified before the Notary Appointment

Der Budapester > Knowledge for Entrepreneurs > Knowledge > Forming a Company and Considering a Holding: Why the Structure Should Be Clarified before the Notary Appointment
22 Minute
Abstrakte schwarz-rote Holdingstruktur auf einem Tablet

In brief: Anyone forming a company who may later place a holding company above it should not wait until after the notarial appointment to consider that structure. Legal form, ownership, management, bank, accounting and the later use of profits are connected. The Budapester coordinates the process in practical terms: first the target structure, then the company, then professional review, then implementation.

Why company formation and holding structures should be considered together

Many founders begin with a simple question: GmbH, UG, Kft, Limited or another form of company? The question matters, but it is rarely the central one. What matters is what the company is intended to do later. Is it to operate a business? Is it to hold shares? Is a second company likely to follow? Are assets to be kept outside the day-to-day business? Should a partner be able to join or leave later?

If these matters arise only after formation, the later restructuring is often more expensive, slower and more complicated. It is possible to place an existing operating company beneath a holding company, but it requires preparation. Ownership interests, valuation, agreements, tax review and register procedures must fit together.

The Budapester therefore does not view company formation as an isolated notarial appointment. He considers whether a later holding structure should already be factored into the first step.

Questions to resolve before formation

A new company may look straightforward at first: choose a name, define its purpose, pay in share capital, attend a notarial appointment and wait for registration. In practice, however, the later benefit depends on questions that should be resolved before notarisation.

  • Who should own it? One person, several shareholders, an existing company or a parent company from the outset?
  • What activity will actually be carried out? The company purpose must fit the real business and should not unnecessarily block later expansion.
  • Where will the work actually be done? Registered office, place of management, bank, accounting and daily practice must not contradict one another.
  • How will money be used later? Investment, reserves, distributions, loans or building shareholdings each require different preparation.
  • Which risks should remain separate? Operating risk, private assets, shareholdings and succession should not be mixed unintentionally.
  • Which countries play a genuine role? Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Hungary or England may be relevant where the business model and substance fit.

When it can make sense to form a holding company from the start

A holding company is neither an obligation nor a status symbol. It can make sense where the entrepreneur already knows that the plan involves more than one operating company. This can include several lines of business, shareholdings, later sales, succession matters or a clear separation between operating risk and the shareholding level.

For a simple formation with no further plans, a single company may be enough. Where several ventures, partners, countries or asset questions are foreseeable, however, the structure should be reviewed early. A later correction remains possible, but it requires additional agreements, additional review and often more coordination with the bank, tax adviser, notary and register.

The Budapester does not replace legal or tax review. He ensures that the right questions reach the authorised professionals in time and that the process does not fall apart into separate pieces.

What can go wrong when there is no structural plan

Errors rarely result from one incorrect tick in a form. Problems arise when the intended development of the company does not fit the chosen structure.

  • The operating company is held personally even though a shareholding level was planned from the outset.
  • A partner joins without decision-making rights, exit arrangements and a sale being properly prepared.
  • A second company is formed later, but agreements, services and cash flows remain unclear.
  • The bank and accounting team learn too late how the structure is actually meant to work.
  • A foreign company is selected even though the place of management and day-to-day operations are clearly in another country.
  • Profits are intended for new projects, but the original structure makes the route more difficult.
  • Private and operating risks remain more closely connected than the entrepreneur intended.

This is where early organisation creates practical value. Not every formation needs a holding company. Every formation does, however, benefit from a clear picture of what should be possible in two, three or five years.

German company, Austrian GmbH, Swiss AG, Liechtenstein or Hungary?

The country follows the purpose, not fashion. A German GmbH can be a sound and appropriate choice if the business, management and customers are predominantly in Germany. An Austrian or Swiss structure may become relevant where genuine commercial reasons exist. Liechtenstein may play a role for foundations, cooperatives, establishments or companies when assets, succession and governing bodies are professionally reviewed. Hungary may be of interest to entrepreneurs who build genuine activity, partnerships, a location or an organisation there.

For Hungarian companies and ongoing organisation, HUNCONSULT can be an appropriate point of contact. The same applies in every country: a formal registered office alone is not enough. Activity, substance, management, documentation, accounting and professional review are decisive.

How the Budapester prepares a formation with structure

The Budapester starts with the entrepreneur’s objective. From that comes a process suited to the formation, holding company, bank, documents and professional review. His role is coordination: he structures the starting position, asks questions, prepares appointments, puts those involved in the right order and keeps the process together.

  1. Define the target structure: What should the company achieve today and what development is foreseeable?
  2. Arrange professional review of legal form and ownership: authorised professionals carry out the technical assessment.
  3. Organise documents and responsibilities: shareholders, identification documents, powers of attorney, drafts, translations and banking questions are prepared.
  4. Coordinate notary and register: appointments and documents are prepared so that the founder does not have to restart for every query.
  5. Make the business operational after formation: bank account, accounting, tax registration, transparency register, bookkeeping and ongoing procedures form part of the practical start.

This process is particularly suited to entrepreneurs who do not only want to register a company, but need a structure that works in day-to-day practice.

The better start: a Structure Check before the notarial appointment

The best time for structural questions is before formation. At that point, the company, ownership, bank, accounting and future development can still be brought together without unnecessary corrections. Those who have already formed a company can nevertheless have a change or holding structure reviewed.

The Budapester works discreetly, practically and with implementation in mind. Legal and tax review remains with the responsible professionals. The benefit lies in the sequence: first understand what is to be achieved, then decide which structure fits.

The page Method contains more about the process. Those wishing to assess the cooperation in concrete terms can begin with a Setup and Structure Check.